![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
| Genesis 32:22-31 (2005) July 31, 2005 Houston, TX Theme: To wrestle with God is to wrestle with each other. To wrestle with each other is to wrestle with God. This past fall Sylvia and I led a small workshop on how to continue becoming a healthier congregation, something that I think is an intentional and difficult work for every congregation, including every one I have ever served as a pastor or have ever been involved in as a congregant. One of the pieces of advice someone like Peter Steinke and other thinkers like him who specialize in church dynamics and systems give is that we ought to only say the stuff about folks that we would say directly to them if they were in the same room with us. Now, I don’t know a lot of people, including myself, that follow that advice much, but its still good advice, but I’m going to go ahead and break that rule right now. Claire Carson, our summer SALT worker, is teaching the children right now in the children’s’ room, for the last time, at least for this summer, and I want to talk about her behind her back, just to share with you what a great gift she has been for those of us who have worked with her this summer—I think I can speak for La Verne, Sylvia, and Tracy in saying that she has contributed a lot to this church these past few months, including helping to pull off a creative Vacation Bible School as well as helping me to plan the fall Children’s Sunday School program. I know I couldn’t have remained sane this summer without her presence and her help with the Christian Education programs, so she is much appreciated and will be greatly missed, as she goes back to Sweet Briar College to begin her second year of school. But more than what she contributed to the programming of our church, what I really appreciate about Claire is what she brought to me in terms of seeing ourselves, the church, with her fresh, particular set of eyes. Or maybe I should say, in seeing the church through her eyes, it reminded me of what a human place this, with all the humanity of it, the fragileness, the politics of this place, as she said in her note of farewell to us in the bulletin. I was a little surprised to see in print something we had talked about a few times, to see her name her surprise about how complex this place is, as complex as any place or group she has ever experienced. We expect more from church, don’t we? We always do, don’t we? And I know a few cynics in the room will say they don’t expect that the church to be less full of political and human intrigue as say, their work office, but still…the office doesn’t claim to be a place where the practice of love is the work at hand—the goal of the office to deliver profits, or deliver services; I mean, not even non-profits claims to deliver love, just much- needed services to help with a human need! Some of you have heard me say this before, but the last thing I used to tell folks in the membership classes I conducted was that the place they were about to join was going to break their hearts—count on it. Of course, it wasn’t particular to that church—it was particular to the church down the street, and the one across town, and one on the other side of the world—every church is like that, every church breaks the hearts of its members and I have few, if any, that are better than the rest. Too much is claimed, too much is called for from this pulpit, and every pulpit in Christendom, for every church not to fail its own words, for the church not to fail its own call to its members to do the work of love, and to not turn this sacred place into yet another office with all of the politics that accompany it. To see the human struggle in this church, or any church, and every church, its almost always a disappointment—such a failure, it seems, on our part, to live out what we preach and say, what we hope to live out and model in our quest to follow the way of this Jesus of Nazareth. And yet this human struggle, this wrestling with each other, to take a queue from our text today, I’m not sure we should be all that disappointed with it or even ourselves for that matter. And I think some of the reason why we ought to give ourselves a break on this matter, this disappointment in the humanity of this place and every place that is the church, is rooted in the story we just heard a few moments ago. In a second, I’ll share the reason why I think there is some wisdom from this ancient, mysterious, even beguiling little text, which might help us wrap our minds around the reality that Claire saw this summer, in her working in her home church for a summer. I want to look at the story for a second to remind ourselves of where we are in the story, in the divine soap opera that David Lewallen shared with us last week. If you remember, Esau has had his rightful blessing from his father stolen by his brother Esau, and the rift in the family, not surprisingly, has been deep and now long in years. Jacob, in an attempt to mend the rift, sends Esau gifts and treasures, hoping, I think, to ease the reconciliation with a little bit of cash, so to speak. In response, Jacob hears only that Esau is coming towards him with 400 men—he doesn’t know whether or not these men are to be a welcoming party or whether they are there to exact Esau’s revenge upon Jacob. All Jacob knows is that a small army of men are coming towards him and the intentions of these men are unclear to him—he does not know what they want from him or what they will do to him. And then this moment happens: alone, in the desert, a man appears before Jacob, and he and this stranger begin a night of wrestling, a night of struggling with each other. Out of nowhere, comes this one whose name we do not know, who purpose is never given, whose strength is more than human, but still very human. The painting on the front of your bulletin today captures some of this struggle, though the faces of Jacob and the man are more serene than you would expect in a wrestling match, and like many painters and commentators, the man Jacob is wresting with is given wings, as if he were an angel, though the text never actually says that Jacob is wrestling with an angelic being. I think these sorts of additions to the text are understandable—what does one do with this kind of text, really, this story of a mysterious man who begins a wrestling match with Jacob in the desert, and who, at the end of that same texts, is named as none other than God? All we know is that this Stranger is the ultimate Stranger, the divine one given flesh and blood for the moment, and for purpose of, seemingly, simply wrestling with Jacob. And so many unanswered questions—why must the man leave before daybreak? If he is a divine being, an angel, or even God, why cannot he seem to beat Jacob, or even disentangle himself from Jacob’s grasp? And why is a blessing demanded by Jacob from this man, and why does he demand the name of this stranger, and yet why does this man never give his name, and, instead, actually re-names Jacob as Israel—instead of giving his own name, he gives Jacob a new name? All of these questions have been the topic of centuries of discussion by Jewish and Christian commentators of this text, and there all sorts of explanations, and attempts to explain—the power and importance of names in ancient cultures, and even our own experience of intimacy when names are shared; and maybe the attempt by the stranger to wrestle free of Jacob before daybreak has to do with the idea of the face of God being like the morning sun, and if we were to ever look fully into that divine face, we humans we would be destroyed by it (think of the story of Moses seeing God, but God not allowing God’s own face to be seen, Moses only sees God’s backside). And there are some explanations of sorts in the text itself—the reason why a particular place in Israel is named what it is name; why certain things are not eaten, and even why a nation will be called what it is called. You could preach a dozen sermons on this text and still come up with a different take on it each and every time, but David’s sermon of last week really set into motion a question I had not really explored in preaching on this text twice before today, and that is the question of “why now,” why this moment arises in the text, right after Esau has sent gifts of reconciliation to his brother, and yet right before the moment he finds out whether or not his estranged brother is coming with 400 men to greet him or to murder him. Of all places in the biblical narrative, in God’s soap opera, in the story of God’s engagement with Israel and eventually all humanity, why does this moment happens between these two markers in the narrative—Jacob attempts to reach out, to reconcile himself with his brother and the deceit that has ripped his family apart, and the other marker—the moment when it will be revealed whether or not Esau exacts his revenge on Jacob for robbing him of his birthright, or whether or not Esau will greet him with joy and tears. Between the Esau coming towards him and the moment when Jacob finds out WHY Esau is coming towards him, stands this story of a night when Jacob wrestles with a stranger in the desert, a stranger the text names as his Creator. I can’t keep from thinking that unlocking some of the meaning of the text is right there in the context of the greater story, the larger narrative, of where this night is placed within the story. Jacob and Esau have been wrestling with each other their whole lives, in all the drama of that family, the politics of who will be first, who will get the most, and the culmination of a lifetime of wrestling with each other is about to find itself in a moment when Esau and Jacob will meet with each other for the first time in years at daybreak, at place that has just been now re-named Penuel, a name that the text says means “For I have seen God face to face, and yet my life is preserved.” The night before Esau and Jacob finish their life-long wrestling match, and we find out who the winner will be, if there is to be a winner at all, we have this moment: Jacob wrestles with yet another, with the stranger who is God. Of course, out of this night of struggle with God, we find out that there is no real winner, no real revelations from God, not even the name of this stranger, only a blessings by the One who has gotten away from Jacob’s grasp, from the One who has finally wrestled himself free from Jacob. I can’t help but think that this wrestling match between Jacob and God, right before the completion of Jacob and Esau’s lifelong wrestling match, is a sign to us of what our work in this world is, this wrestling with each other, this struggle to find common ground, to find reconciliation with each other in the midst of this community, and every community of Christian faith. I mean, if God chooses to wrestle with Jacob, and thus I think, wrestles with us, because who can’t identify with Jacob here, who has not wrestle with God in their own lives—if God chooses to wrestle with Jacob, with us, why does it surprise us and maybe even disturb us when we so obviously wrestle with each other with the same kind of passion that God would choose to wrestle with us? If it’s good enough for God, if God wrestles with each of us, and we, in turn, wrestle with God, we struggle with God in our own deserts in life, we probably shouldn’t be too surprised that we humans wrestle with each other with same passion that God has chosen to wrestle with us. I wonder about this as well: the divine wrestling match between Jacob and God comes before the completion of the one between Jacob and Esau—I just wonder if it is not a sign to us that to wrestle with each other, to struggle with each other, in all of our humanity and politics and sometimes stupidity, I wonder if our wrestling with each other is not also our own wrestling with God. I mean, after all, the way God wrestles with Jacob is as a man, a human being, not some spirit, not some ethereal, bodiless being, but as a man, flesh and blood, something Jacob was familiar struggling with, something he was familiar wrestling with his whole life. Maybe the choice in the story to have God wrestle as a being that was all too familiar, maybe that choice was the narrator trying to tell us something. Maybe to wrestle with each other is to wrestle with God. And maybe to wrestle with God is to wrestle with each other. Maybe to struggle with each other, with our humanity, the joy and certainly heartbreak of a place and a people, maybe that struggle is our struggle with God. And the struggle with each other leads to the possibility of daybreak, that which greets Jacob on the other side of that difficult night of struggling with God, of walking out of that desert, wounded, but now blessed, now given good in the midst of what seemed like an endless, endless night. I think it is what Esau says to Jacob, in what becomes a moment of reconciliation, not revenge, when they greet each other at daybreak—“Let us journey on our way, and I will go alongside you.” Or maybe all of this is me justifying the humanity of the church, the petty human politics of this place and every other place that gathers together the followers of this Jesus of Nazareth, to someone like Claire, who now sees her own community of faith for what it is, as human as any other place. Still, I can’t keep thinking that it’s the humanity of the place that will save us, the wrestling with each other that will make all the difference in our relationship with God, and with each other. Maybe the difference between the church and, let’s say, the Kiwanis Club is that the church knows that the whole point of it all is the wrestling itself, with each other, and with God. To wrestle with God and to wrestle with each other, which are probably the one and the same moment, and to hope that the daybreak brings with it reconciliation, maybe that is the point of it all, why the church exists. Jacob, with his broken hip and his new name, facing Esau across the long desert, the sun beginning to dissolve what seemed like an endless night, the possibility of that moment, the results of the struggle with each other, and with God, maybe that is why we are gathered here, doing the work of living of our lives together as a people of faith. It is what I would offer Claire, if she were in the room, and if I wasn’t breaking that rule I mentioned earlier, if I wasn’t failing my own words at this moment. Amen and amen. |
|||||